Discussion:
Bug#1084789: d-i.debian.org: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso has multiple versions of module udebs
Add Reply
Cyril Brulebois
2024-10-08 10:00:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Package: d-i.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Debian Installer Maintainers,
debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso (Trixie) has recently grown in size,
both daily and weekly builds.
linux-image is version 6.10.11-1, but there are multiple versions
* btrfs-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb
Is there any reason to have non-6.10.11-1 versions of the module udebs?
If not, then the image should be able to shrink by 9% or so.
Looping in debian-cd@, who is responsible for those images.


Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (***@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Daniel Lewart
2024-11-04 10:40:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
linux-image is version 6.10.11-1, but there are multiple versions
* btrfs-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb
Is there any reason to have non-6.10.11-1 versions of the module udebs?
Now linux-image is version 6.11.5-1, and the bloat keeps increasing:
* btrfs-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.11.4-amd64-di_6.11.4-1_amd64.udeb
* btrfs-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di_6.11.5-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* crc-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.9-amd64-di_6.10.9-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.11-amd64-di_6.10.11-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.10.12-amd64-di_6.10.12-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.11.2-amd64-di_6.11.2-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.11.4-amd64-di_6.11.4-1_amd64.udeb
* crypto-dm-modules-6.11.5-amd64-di_6.11.5-1_amd64.udeb
...

Daniel Lewart
Urbana, Illinois

Loading...